Zeeka saysProbabilistic finality (Bitcoin) means reversal probability decays exponentially with confirmations; absolute finality (Tendermint, FFG-finalized eth) means a finalized block is mathematically irreversible without slashing 1/3 of stake.
The two finality models trade off in opposite directions. Probabilistic finality (Bitcoin) never declares a block "final" — it lets reversal probability decay as (q/p)^N with confirmations. The chain never halts, but settlement is statistical. Absolute finality (Tendermint, FFG-finalized eth) declares a block irreversible the moment a 2/3 supermajority signs. Reversal then requires demonstrably byzantine behavior worth 1/3 of stake getting slashed.
Each model has a real cost. Probabilistic finality has no liveness halt — even if the network partitions, both halves keep mining. Absolute-finality systems halt if more than 1/3 of stake goes offline (no supermajority possible), trading liveness for crisp settlement. Bridges, exchanges, and rollups choose between them based on whether they value uptime or speed of irrevocable settlement.
Power-ups you unlock
Bitcoin: P(reversal) ≈ (q/p)^N — never zero, just vanishingly small
Tendermint / FFG: once 2/3 sign, the block is final